Skip to main content

Question and answer revisited

Here's one in English:

When I was trained in the 70's at the West London Institute of HE (London University) question and answer technique was the established othodoxy in modern language teaching. It had been the practice of teachers like Alan Hornsey and David Harris and before them a certain Mrs Hodgson, if I recall correctly. It was the staple diet of Mark Gilbert's Cours Illustré de Français, which was forward-looking for its time and which I had used as a secondary student.

Question and answer technique has its limitations, but it remains a powerful tool in our armoury. Why is it so good? And how do we do it?

Let's take the second point first: we use a hierarchy of question forms, starting with the easiest (yes/no or true/false) and working up to the hardest (open-ended questions with a "what" idea). In between we have either/or questions and fairly closed question-word questions using "when", "where", "what time" etc.

You have to work at pace to stop a class flagging and it may only work well for a limited time, maybe 20 minutes with able students, 10 with less able. The teacher can ask questions, pupils can ask questions to the teacher or to each other. The teacher can ask as pupils write down answers (good for a calming afternoon session). The teacher can give false statements which pupils correct (they like this).

Pupils usually put up their hands, but you can put them on the spot a bit - this can make them sit up and concentrate harder. You can mix up individual questions with repetition (group or individual).

Visual aids are great for QA, but texts offer a lot of variety too.

So, why do it?

Good for teaching listening skill, brilliant for controlling the release of material at the right level (selection and grading), good for class control, provides lots of target language input, encourages pupils to induce grammar rules, suits the teacher who enjoys leading, good for modelling good pronunciation, it's demanding, plays on the behaviourist learning model (plenty of repetition and drilling), it's good for promoting accuracy (teacher's model is better than a partner's) and it is form of communication, albeit artificial. Don't forget what it replaced: grammar-translation.

Downsides? Yes, it's not authentic communication, but we are in a classroom, not on the street, so plausible is fine, authentic not vital. Only one child speaks at a time, what are the others doing? Listening? Who knows?! But if you work fast and keep them on their toes you can keep them on task. It's demanding on concentration and some groups may not take it for long. is it fun? Does it have to be??

Overall we would be foolish not to make the most of this most basic of techniques. I am less gung-ho about it than when I started teaching. I was more dogmatic then, less pragmatic. But I do wonder whether young teachers receive any training on questioning techniques and the value of question-answer as a pedagogical tool.


Popular posts from this blog

New GCSE resources on frenchteacher

As well as writing resources for the new A-levels, I have in recent months been posting a good range of materials to support the new GCSEs. First exams are not until 2018, but here is what you can find on the site in addition to the many other resources (grammar exercises, texts, video listening etc).

I shall not produce vocabulary lists since the exam board specifications now offer these, with translations.

Foundation Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Role-plays
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (2)
100 translation sentences into French (with answers)
Reading exam
Reading exam (2)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a good Foundation Tier essay (Word)

Higher Tier 

AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier)
AQA-style GCSE 2016 Photo card conversations (Higher tier) (2)
20 translations into French (with answers)
Reading exam (Higher tier)
How to write a good Higher Tier essay (ppt)
How to write a…

What teachers are saying about The Language Teacher Toolkit

"The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence." (Ernesto Macaro, Oxford University Department of Education)

"I absolutely love this book based on research and full of activities..  The best manual I've read so far. One of our PDs from the Australian Board of Studies recommended your book as an excellent resource.  I look forward to the conference here in Sydney." Michela Pezzi, Teacher, Australia, Facebook)

"Finally, a book for World Language teachers that provides practical ideas and strategies that can actually be used in the classroom, rather than dry rhetoric and theory that does little to inspire creativity in ways that are engaging for both students and teachers alike." (USA teacher, Amazon review)

5 great zero preparation lesson ideas

When the pressure is on and there are only so many hours on the week, you need a repertoire of zero preparation go-to activities which promote input and/or practice. Here are five you might well find useful.

1. My weekend

We know that listening is the most important yet often neglected skill for language learning. It's also something some pupils find hard to do. To develop listening skill and provide tailored comprehensible input try this:

You tell the class you are going to recount what you did last weekend and that they have to make notes in English. The amount of detail you go into and the speed you go will depend on your class. Talk for about three minutes. If you spent the whole weekend marking, you can always make stuff up!

You then make some true or false (maybe not mentioned too) statements in the target language about what you said in your account. Class gives hands up (or no hands up) answers. This can then lead into a simple pair work task where pupils make up their own tru…

Three AQA A-level courses compared

I've put together my three reviews of worthy A-level courses which you might be considering for next September. They are all very useful courses, but with significant differences. The traditional Hodder and OUP book-based courses differ in that the former comes in one chunky two year book, whilst OUP's comes in two parts, the first for AS or the first year of an A-level course. The Attitudes16 course by Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri is based on an online platform from which you would download worksheets and share a logon with studenst who would do the interactive parts (Textivate and video work). The two text books are supported by interactive material (Kerboodle) or an e-text book.


An excellent resource which should be competing for your attention at the moment is the Attitudes16 course which writers Steve Glover and Nathalie Kaddouri have been working on for some time. You can find it here at, along with his excellent resources for film and li…

The Language Teacher Toolkit review

We were delighted to receive a review of The Language Teacher Toolkit from eminent applied linguist Ernesto Macaro from Oxford University. Macaro is a leader in the field of second language acquisition and applied linguistics. His main research interests are teacher-student interaction and language learning strategies pupils can use to improve their progress.

Here is Professor Macaro's review:
The Language Teacher Toolkit is a really useful book for language teachers to either read all the way through or dip into. What I like about it is that the authors Steve Smith and Gianfranco Conti are totally upfront about what they believe to be good practice but back it up with research evidence. So for example the ‘methodological principles’ on page 11 are supported by the research they then refer to later in the book and this approach is very similar to the one that we (Ernesto Macaro, Suzanne Graham, Robert Woore) have adopted in our ‘consortium project’( The point i…