Skip to main content

Vaccin contre la Grippe A

Tandis que le nombre de  nouveaux cas de grippe A commence à augmenter en Angleterre....
Selon AFP:
"La France devrait pouvoir disposer dans les toutes prochaines semaines d'au moins un million de doses de vaccins, le laboratoire britannique GlaxoSmithKline ayant obtenu l'aval de l'agence européenne des médicaments (EMEA) pour la mise sur le marché de ses vaccins.
Les autorités sanitaires françaises ont commandé ferme 50 millions de doses à GSK, et 16 millions de doses à Novartis, les deux laboratoires qui ont obtenu la recommandation européenne.
Il faut encore que la Commission européenne délivre l'autorisation de mise sur le marché, ce qui devrait être fait vers le début octobre. Les lots vaccinaux devraient être ensuite "libérés", c'est à dire contrôlés une dernière fois nationalement sur de petits animaux.
La ministre de la Santé, Roselyne Bachelot, a indiqué jeudi que la France devrait disposer "vers le 9 octobre" de 1 à 1,2 million de doses de vaccins de GSK.
En ce qui concerne Novartis, les premières livraisons sont prévues fin octobre/début novembre, indique-t-on vendredi au ministère.
Les autres laboratoires à qui la France a passé commande - Sanofi-Pasteur, pour 28 millions de doses, et Baxter, pour 50.000 doses - n'ont pas encore reçu l'aval des autorités européennes.
Sanofi-Pasteur a en effet une évaluation plus longue à subir, ne disposant pas d'une autorisation "prototype" comme certains laboratoires.
La firme devrait être à même de livrer les premiers vaccins vers la fin novembre, selon son directeur général, Chris Viehbacher, et la totalité des 28 millions de doses d'ici la fin de l'année.
Pour Baxter, un porte-parole de l'EMEA a précisé qu'un "problème concernant la qualité du vaccin" retardait son autorisation, mais qu'il devrait être réglé "la semaine prochaine".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g