Skip to main content

What now for primary MFL?

Looks like the new government is putting on hold revisions to the primary curriculum. Will there be a continued push with primary languages? It's true that coverage of MFL is still very patchy, although 92% of primary schools are apparently offering something. I've always been on the sceptical side of the primary MFL argument, but if it is eventually decided that primary schools will be able to choose their own curriculum to a greater extent I can easily foresee the MFL strategy collapsing.

If that were the case we would be back to where we were in the 1960's with a minority of more able and socially advantaged children having access to modern language learning after 14 and some limited coverage at primary level. Less able students will still have access at KS3.

Here is what Teachers' TV reported:

"Since December 2002 when the national languages strategy was put in place, language has taken on a new importance in primary schools. 92 per cent of them now teach a modern foreign language. But that could all change depending on new Government policy. The National Centre for Languages (CILT) believes the subject is vital at primary level and the benefits are wide ranging. It would like to see languages become a compulsory part of primary education. "Apart from giving children the opportunity to learn a new language" says Teresa Tinsley from the centre, "the subject can also aid pupils' literacy and development in their own language. In an international world it is also important to open up pupils' eyes to different cultures and for teachers it means an opportunity to link the subject up with others, like history or numeracy".
But the implementation of languages at key stage 1 and 2 is still at an early stage of its development and CILT wants reassurance from the new Department for Education that the momentum created over the last few years will continue.
It especially wants to see the training for teachers continued and more specifically support for linguistic development.
The Department for Education says it hasn't got into the details yet of which subjects are to be made compulsory at primary level. Schools minister Nick Gibb says the Government wants to ensure "a relentless focus on the basics" and give teachers "more flexibility".
But, whether languages are considered by the government to be a core part of the curriculum for years 1 to 6 remains to be seen. There's likely to be an announcement soon, but any decisions made probably won't come into effect until 2012 or later."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,