Skip to main content

Back in the swing

Good to be back with classes. Teaching is the most enjoyable part of our job, far more interesting than target setting and analysing results.

One of the major areas for us to think about this year is the new GCSE with its controlled assessments and discrete skill testing for listening and reading. I'm not a fan of the latter. We have been down this road before and I know what will happen. English teachers of MFL, naturally focused on achieving the best results, will adapt their teaching to the testing method. If this method involves, for example, texts in the foreign language with questions in English, then teachers will happily incorporate this approach into their schemes of work. Text books will reflect the same methodology (see already the Nelson AQA French course). It's called the "backwash effect".

This will lead to lazy teaching and poor methodology. We must avoid, as far as we can, a methodology which retreats too far from the principle of using the target language in large amounts. I've never been dogmatic on this issue, but if we are not using TL at least, say, 80% of the time, we are not providing students with the input they need to progress. Skill in language is largely acquired naturally when we provide plenty of comprehensible input, as Stephen Krashen, the well-known and influential applied linguist put it. He went further and claimed in his monitor model that so-called "conscious" learning was next to useless in language acquisition and that it merely acted as an editing, or monitoring facility, which could check for correctness. I thought his model was deficient and simplistic, but his general point was sound.

When you add to the equation that our time with pupils is very limited in some schools, it is doubly important to provide enough target language.

So we as a department are determined not to fall into the trap of teaching and assessing through the medium of English.

Nor shall we spend nearly every lesson in a desperate attempt to maximise performance in the controlled assessments. Another danger this year is that schools, again in their anxiety to do statistically well in the exams, will offer a diet of teaching to controlled assessments, doing umpteen speaking assessments and too many written assessments. This could disrupt totally a sensible teaching sequence where grammatical progression and vocab building should play a leading role.

So, as always, we should do what is right and not be led too closely by the assessment system in place at the time. Just teach well!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,