Skip to main content

A simple version of the game Pointless

Here is a smashing little idea from a teacher which I read about in the Spring 2014 edition of Languages Today from the ALL (Association for Language Learning).

It's a version of the TV quiz game Pointless.

In case this show has passed you by, in a nutshell contestants have to give answers to questions which were posed to members of the public. The aim is to provide an answer no member of the public gave.

In this case you give pupils 5-10 minutes to write down as many words they've been taught. The object of the game is for pupils to write down at least one word which no-one else has thought of. Pupils get one point for every correct word and five points for a word which no-one else has thought of - a "pointless" answer.

This could work for near beginners up to advanced level students. It could also be played with pairs against pairs. At advanced level, if a general theme was given for the vocabulary, say, health, then the lists would be long and useful oral and listening practice could be had as students try to justify controversial choices.

A more challenging extension of this idea for near beginners or intermediates would be to use key phrases or short statements rather than individual words. e.g. "Write down any statements/phrases you might use in a café, restaurant, tourist office, classroom etc".

The sting in the tail of this game would be the "marking" part in the lesson, when there would be potential for mayhem! For the single word game, if the emphasis is on spelling accuracy, the lists could simple be collected in for quick tick marking, though finding the pointless answers would be a pain! A time-saving and more useful approach would be to provide a printed list of correct words, swap written lists and have another pupil mark. Pointless answers would have to be identified as quickly as possible by the teacher walking around.

An easier to manage solution would be to have small groups who could simple self mark after their time is up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite Ă  60 ans

Suite Ă  mon post rĂ©cent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge lĂ©gal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir Ă  quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge rĂ©el de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prĂ©tendre qu'il y a peu de diffĂ©rence Ă  cet Ă©gard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation Ă  Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite Ă  60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui dĂ©fend la retraite Ă  60 ans (BVA) CĂ©cile QuĂ©guiner Plus de la moitiĂ© des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la rĂ©forme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de dĂ©fendre l’âge lĂ©gal de dĂ©part en retraite Ă  60 ans ". RĂ©sultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majoritĂ© de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui dĂ©fend le maintien de l’âge lĂ©gal de dĂ©part Ă  la retraite Ă  60 ans,