Skip to main content

Speaky

I downloaded the Speaky app from the Apple  store to see what it does. It is currently free but may soon come at a small charge. It is one of a number of text-to-speech apps; others are reviewed here.

Essentially it is text-to-speech tool which reads out texts in very acceptable French. Lots of other languages are available. You can type in your own text, copy and paste text or just enter a URL for a site in French. Speaky recognises the language from the text and will give you pronunciation options ("standard" or Canadian French). In each case the text is read aloud for the user with the speed of delivery being adjustable. As is typical with text-to-speech tools the intonation is not entirely natural, but nor does it sound unacceptably artificial. The accent is excellent.

Who could use this? Well, I certainly had pupils who would write out text for their oral controlled assessment into text-to-speech sites so that they could practise by hearing a good spoken model. This does just the same, but in a rather more convenient fashion for iPad and iPhone. Teachers working with iPads might find use for this, especially if pupils have headphones for personal listening.

Other learners, for example adults doing continuing education, would also find use for the app in terms of improving their pronunciation, or helping them prepare for oral presentations.

In addition, teachers could produce listening exercises from approprate written texts. Just copy in the text, produce a comprehension worksheet and off you go!

Users who are blind or who have poor vision would also find such an app extremely useful and for this reason alone the app deserves a solid recommendation.

 I would recommend it for teachers using iPads too. It comes with a few pages of simple tutorial. When I used it initially I got stuck as I did not spot the small cross at the top right of the "Let's get started" screen. You have to select this to start adding text. Maybe it could have been made more prominent.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more