Skip to main content

Spring-cleaning at Frenchteacher Towers


View from here


Just a note to frenchteacher subscribers to say that I've been going through all the subscriber pages of the site checking that all the resources are up to date and accurate. I've also been making some minor cosmetic changes to the appearance of the most of the worksheets.

So far I have gone through the Y8, Y9 and Y10-11 pages. I am currently working through the A-level pages and bearing in mind the latest changes to exam specifications while doing so. Most of my resources have a good shelf-life, but some require updating with latest figures and a few need ditching completely.

Changes in technology mean that some discussion questions go quickly out of date, notably with regard to the internet, music and TV. I have been updating these.

In addition, as the old specs disappear this summer, you'll find that the A-level page in particular will be reorganised somewhat. I have renamed the "current" A-level, "legacy" and have moved some resources around, fitting them in with the new specs where relevant.

Some topics are, of course, no longer in the specifications, notably science and the environment. I shall leave  these resources on the site just in case you want to use them. Quite a lot of subscribers are outside the UK and they may want to use these too.

As always, I welcome feedback on the site and ideas for new resources. I am aware that not all the resources have answer keys, but my time is limited and I would prefer to write new resources rather than go through older ones adding answers.

Thank you for subscribing and thanks in particular to the many schools and teachers who subscribe year after year. I shall not be changing the subscription price and I hope you continue to find it excellent value.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more