Skip to main content

Chansons FLE

http://chansonsfle.blogspot.com.es/

Abel Carballiño vient de me signaler son blog où il poste des vidéoclips de chansons avec les paroles (prises sur Youtube). Vous n'avez qu'à cliquer sur la chanson dans la mosaïque. On peut écouter la chanson, regarder la vidéo et les paroles. Ça serait bien à condition que le site ne soit pas bloqué dans votre établissement.

Bonne idée, bien réalisée. Le format "mosaic" de Blogger est bien choisi.

Voici Mylène Farmer avec "C'est une belle journée".


Et les paroles:

 
Allongé le corps est mort
Pour des milliers
C'est un homme qui dort...
A moitié pleine est l'amphore
C'est à moitié vide
Qu'on la voit sans effort
Voir la vie, son côté pile
Oh philosophie,
dis-moi des élégies
Le bonheur
Lui me fait peur
D'avoir tant d'envies
Moi j'ai un souffle à cœur
Aussi

[Refrain]
C'est une belle journée
Je vais me coucher
Une si belle journée
qui s'achève
donne l'envie d'aimer,
mais je vais me coucher.
Mordre l'éternité
  à dents pleines
C'est une belle journée
Je vais me coucher
Une si belle journée
souveraine
donne l'envie de paix
Voir des anges à mes pieds
Mais je vais me coucher
M'faire la belle

Allongé le corps est mort
Pour des milliers
C'est un homme qui dort...
A moitié pleine est l'amphore
C'est à moitié vide
que je la vois encore
Tout est dit puisqu'en amour
si c'est du lourd
Le cœur est léger
Des élégies toujours
Les plaisirs, les longs, les courts
Vois-tu en amour
moi, j'ai le souffle court
Vois-tu

[Refrain]

Belle
La vie est belle
comme une aile
Qu'on ne doit froisser
Belle,
la vie est belle
et je vais là
Belle,
la vie est belle
mais la mienne
Un monde emporté
Elle, j'entre en elle
et mortelle, va.

[Refrain]x2


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

The 2026 GCSE subject content is published!

Two DfE documents were published today. The first was the response to the consultation about the proposed new GCSE (originally due in October 2021) and the second is the subject content document which, ultimately, is of most interest to MFL teachers in England. Here is the link  to the document.  We are talking about an exam to be done from 2026 (current Y7s). There is always a tendency for sceptical teachers to think that consultations are a bit of a sham and that the DfE will just go ahead and do what they want when it comes to exam reform. In this case, the responses to the original proposals were mixed, and most certainly hostile as far as exam boards and professional associations representing the MFL community, universities, head teachers and awarding bodies are concerned. What has emerged does reveal some significant changes which take account of a number of criticisms levelled at the proposals. As I read it, the most important changes relate to vocabulary and the issue of topics