Skip to main content

Recorded sounds lesson

Here's a simple idea for a lesson, or part of a lesson for intermediate or advanced students. You could possibly combine it with the tired daily routine topic. Get a digital recorder or use your phone and record as many sounds as you can around the house. Here are a few you could easily record:
  • running a tap
  • flushing the toilet
  • boiling a kettle
  • using a can opener
  • pouring a drink
  • opening a bottle of fizzy drink
  • pulling a wine cork
  • running the washing machine or dishwasher
  • opening the fridge door
  • opening and closing doors
  • hoovering
  • using the microwave
  • closing the oven door
  • laying the table
  • scraping a chair across the floor
  • switching the radio on or off
  • typing on the PC
  • switching on a light
  • using a whisk
  • cracking an egg
  • opening a packet
  • cutting with scissors
  • dropping ice into a glass
  • blowing your nose
  • chopping or peeling vegetables
  • climbing stairs
  • dropping an object (e.g. cutlery or unwanted crockery!)
You could play the sounds in sequence whilst students note down in the target language what is being done. They should always attempt an answer. Then students could compare answers orally in pairs.

An alternative, to make the exercise accessible to less advanced learners, would be to produce a set of sentences for a matching task: match sentence with each sound.

You could build in some grammar practice by describing in present and past tenses. I'm sure imaginative teachers could come up with other, better ways for exploiting such sounds.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,
4 comments
Read more

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).
Post a Comment
Read more

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g
2 comments
Read more